Tuesday, October 19, 2004
From Ann Coulter
-Read the whole piece!
{Don't you just love Ann's writing? - PajamaGuy}
Thursday, October 07, 2004
Have They Answered the "Question?"
Does anyone know if that question has been answered by either Kerry or Edwards?
HughHewitt.com
And in this era of newly emerging democracies, it is unfortunate that home grown thugs in Florida, Wisconsin and elsewhere are modeling exactly the opposite of democratic behavior."
Monday, October 04, 2004
Exclusive: Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties(CNSNews.com)
{...wonder how Waffles is going to trivialize this...???}
So What If It's A Pen?
I don't really care if it's the first offering his oldest daughter gave up to the Tooth Fairy! Are we getting so complacent in this country that breaking rules is o.k. so long as no damage is done. Please say it ain't so! Saying something you know to be not true is a lie. Creating a fake or false government record is against the law. It doesn't matter if it's a fake memo from a Texas Air National Guardsman, or an After Action report that lists falsehoods.
Section 5, pages 4-5 of the binding "Memorandum of Understanding" that was
negotiated and agreed upon by both political campaigns states: "No props, notes,
charts, diagrams, or other writings or other tangible things may be brought into
the debate by either candidate.... Each candidate must submit to the staff of
the Commission prior to the debate all such paper and any pens or pencils with
which a candidate may wish to take notes during the debate, and the staff or
commission will place such paper, pens and pencils on the podium..."
Why does no one care that the Democratic Party's candidate for President of the United States broke the rules? Why is it trivial?
Sunday, October 03, 2004
John Kerry Violated Debate Rules
Check out the video!
John Kerry brought prohibited material into last Thursday's Presidential Debate.
From section 5, pages 4-5 of the binding 'Memorandum of Understanding' (pdf file) that was negotiated and agreed upon by both political campaigns:
(c) No props, notes, charts, diagrams, or other writings or other tangible things may be brought into the debate by either candidate.
{The video clearly shows the honerable Senator taking something from within his right jacket inside pocket! Check it out!}
{The Trackback from INCD doesn't work; the links in this post take you to the INDC top}
Friday, October 01, 2004
James Lileks Bleating -
"Here’s the thing. I’d really like to live in John Kerry’s world. It seems like such a rational, sensible place, where handshakes and signatures have the power to change the face of the planet. If only the terrorists lived there as well.
Who does Zarkowi fear the most - France, summiteers, or Marines? If the rightness of a cause is measured by the number of one’s allies, would Britain have been right if the US had stayed neutral in World War Two?
And that’s what I felt after 30 minutes of the debate. If I’d stuck around for the whole thing, I think I’d be sleeping in the tool shed tonight, chewing on the old discarded Tiki torches. Now it’s time for a scotch and some TV; see you Monday. And thanks for reading this far. God knows I wouldn’t have. I do go on, don’t I. Alas and alack. "
{excerpted from a great read!}
Faces of Frustration
I Feel Better Now!
Finally, it was over. 60/40 Kerry - I didn't want to hear the spinmeisters - went to bed.
If you replay it, try turning the sound off. Kerry wins that one big time!
So this morning I started reading... and reading... and everyone of the blogs is saying the same 2 things: #1- Kerry wins on points. #2- Everybody believes #1 except Hugh Hewitt!?!!?
I went and read his blog and studied the Hugh Hewitt's Scorecard. Now I feel better!